A Spotlight on Executive Protection
What is Executive Protection?
Executive protection, also known as close protection, involves a range of security measures to safeguard high-profile individuals like business executives, using risk assessment, planning, bodyguards, and physical security measures.Jump To:
- About Executive Protection
- EP Training Programmes
- Threat Assessment
- Vulnerability Assessments
- The Effect of Complacency
- Recruitment and Training
Introduction to Executive Protection Security
The street shooting of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson whilst attending a business conference on December 4th, 2024, shone a spotlight on the executive protection security sector.
The incident highlighted the risk that corporate bosses face as well as what appeared to be a complete absence of close protection for a top executive who had recently been receiving threats.
Another aspect of the incident that both surprised and caused concern to observers was that since the murder, there’s been a worrying acceptance of the violence and even support for the subsequently arrested suspect. People in the far reaches of social media have been upholding him as a cult hero.
The Network Contagion Research Institute reported a huge increase in social media posts glorifying the shooting and calling for more of the same.
The report also states that “Telegram posts have been circulating the names of other healthcare executives alongside explicit calls to violence.”
Could Claim Denial Put Insurance Executives Like Brian Thompson at Risk?
United Healthcare provides health insurance covering medical expenses on the US healthcare network.
The company tops the denied claims chart with a claim denial rate of around 32% (double the average).
Clearly, there is a growing sense of discontent around the perception of corporate greed and control and its effect on, in this case, access to healthcare funding and on pressured household budgets more generally.
More about executive protection
Executive protection, also known as close protection, covers a range of security measures to safeguard high-profile individuals, such as corporate executives, high-ranking officials, and politicians. These measures include risk assessment, planning, and physical security to protect against threats like kidnapping, assault, and other dangers.
Executive protection is a particularly complex branch of the close protection and bodyguarding security sector.
More often than not, executive protection will include physical security in the form of a bodyguard or a close protection team.
What are the main risks?
One of the main reasons why executive protection is so complex is the variety and extent of threats to safety faced by corporate executives. Threats can come from all directions, including:
- Members of the public who feel oppressed, conned, or let down by big businesses such as pharmaceuticals, healthcare providers, insurance companies, retailers, and similar businesses
- Disgruntled employees who feel that they have been treated unfairly
- Activists and protest groups who oppose the company’s policies or practices.
- Competitors looking to gain an advantage through intimidation or sabotage.
- Cyber threats such as hacking and data breaches that compromise personal safety.
- Terrorist organisations targeting high-profile individuals for political or ideological reasons.
- Kidnappers looking for a financial payout or some other form of leverage.
Further complications may arise because perpetrators may have as much to gain by targeting the close family of executives as they would by targeting the executives. This extends the pressure on the family and the scope of the risk.
Complacency and Its Impact on Executive Security
When it takes a high-profile assassination of a corporate executive to bring executive protection back into the spotlight, a natural assumption is that some corporations may suffer from complacency. Complacency poses a significant security risk for top executives by increasing their vulnerability to potential crises.
Complacency occurs when individuals or corporations underestimate threats or become reluctant to review current security arrangements. Symptoms include:
- Reduced Awareness: A failure to recognise or be prepared for danger
- Underestimating Threats: Complacency can cause executives to dismiss credible threats, making them more susceptible to attacks.
- Neglected Protocols: Routine security measures might be overlooked, increasing the risk of breaches.
- Overconfidence or a False Sense of Security: Believing that existing measures are sufficient can prevent regular security reviews and cause a lack of frequent training sessions to keep security at the forefront of executives’ minds.
- Predictable Patterns: Complacent security practices can create predictable routines that can be exploited
- A Lack of Training Refreshment or Security Reviews: Conducting regular training and awareness sessions can keep security at the front of executives’ minds while regularly revising threat assessments to reflect changes to conditions can help counter complacency.
Who are the major spenders on executive protection?
| Meta Platforms: Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp | Approximately $24.4 million for CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other executives, making it the highest spender in the S&P 500 for executive security. |
| Alphabet: Google, Youtube, Nest | Spent nearly $6.8 million on personal security for CEO Sundar Pichai. |
| Amazon: | Total security expenses reached about $2.7 million, which included costs for CEO Andy Jassy and former CEO Jeff Bezos. |
| Nvidia: | Allocated around $2.5 million for CEO Jensen Huang, primarily for residential security and consultation fees. |
| Apple: | Spent approximately $2.4 million on security for CEO Tim Cook, which included personal security services and private air travel costs. |
| Tesla: | Reported spending $2.4 million for CEO Elon Musk’s security services. |
| Microsoft: | Spent approximately $58,291 on security-related costs and personal travel expenses for CEO Satya Nadella in 2024 |
While these figures illustrate the growing trend of companies investing heavily in the safety and security of their executives, there is a huge difference in the amount spent by Meta and that spent by Microsoft. What might be the reason for this?
Meta Platforms
Mark Zuckerberg is one of the most recognisable figures in the tech world, making him a more prominent target for both online and offline threats. Meta Platforms, particularly Facebook, have faced intense scrutiny and criticism, attracting a wider range of threats stemming from data privacy issues, misinformation, and the impact of social media on society.
Microsoft
While facing its own set of primarily cyber-related threats, it operates in a more traditional business environment with a less elevated public image. CEO Satya Nadella is a much less controversial figure and less publicly recognisable.
Designing Executive Protection Programmes that Work
There is no industry standard for executive protection. The Board of Executive Protection Professionals is developing one and hopes to have it approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) sometime this year.
Understanding Threat Assessment in Executive Protection (EP)
Threat assessment is essential for establishing an effective executive protection (EP) programme. It involves identifying credible threats to senior executives and adjusting protection measures accordingly.
Key Objectives:
- Determine the scope of the EP programme.
- Assess the level of protection required for executives.
- Decide at what levels within the organisation that protection should be offered; for example, should it be extended to junior executives and family members?
Risk Factors:
Ongoing threat assessments must consider a variety of risk factors:
Executive-Related Factors:
- Public profile
- Social media profile
- Outside organisational or political ties
Company-Related Factors:
- Controversial products or practices
- Public perception
- Corporate downsizing and job-cutting
- Levels of corporate debt and ability to make payments
- Negative media coverage
- Legal or regulatory issues
Environmental Factors:
- Political instability
- Geopolitical issues
- Economic downturns
- Emerging technologies
- Climate-related effects or controversies
Conducting a Vulnerability Assessment
Alongside threat assessments, vulnerability audits can highlight any risks associated with:
- The workplace
- Homes and the safety of close family
- Travel plans and methods of transportation
- Public appearances
- Media engagements
- Attendance at corporate events
Broader Implications
Attacks potentially impact the executives and their families in terms of their physical, emotional and mental health. They may also affect the company’s financial health and operational capability.
Updates on, and input into risk factor identification and security deployment strategies should go beyond the security team to ensure that feedback from the company executives themselves, board members and even close family is taken into account.
The Importance of Recruitment and Training
The right recruitment and training processes are critical for effective executive protection services. They minimise the risk of security breaches and potential harm to the protected people as well as lessen the pressure on them by inspiring trust and confidence.
For this reason, many corporations source executive protection services from expert contractors like Titan Security Global.
Choosing the Right People:
Executive protection demands a unique blend of skills. Whilst robust recruitment and training programmes are essential, selecting close protection officers with an instinctive aptitude and the characteristics and traits that make them receptive to training will help.
Skill Sets:
Physical Ability: Excellent physical fitness, self-defence abilities, and the ability to react quickly in high-pressure situations.
Mental Sharpness: Strong situational awareness, problem-solving skills, and the ability to think strategically when under stress.
Interpersonal Skills: Diplomacy, discretion, and the ability to build trust.
Personality Traits:
- Calm under Pressure: Maintaining composure in volatile situations is essential.
- Discretion and Integrity: Handling sensitive information with utmost confidentiality.
- Teamwork: Ability to work seamlessly within a team and coordinate with other security personnel.
Comprehensive Training Programmes:
Dealing with the complexities and unpredictability of executive protection requires a high level of specialist training for those engaged in the field.
- Technical Skills:
- Threat Assessment: Identifying and mitigating potential threats.
- Surveillance Detection: Recognising and countering surveillance attempts.
- Defensive Driving: Safe and secure transportation of the protectee.
- First Aid and Medical Response: Preparedness for medical emergencies.
- Use of Force: Proper use of force techniques and de-escalation strategies.
- Tactical Skills:
- Operations: Techniques for protecting the principal in all scenarios.
- Evacuation Procedures: Plan and execute safe evacuations in emergencies.
- Counter-Surveillance Techniques: Methods to avoid and counter surveillance efforts.
- Alertness: The ability to remain alert to the potential for danger during long periods of inactivity
- Legal and Ethical Considerations:
- Understanding relevant laws and regulations.
- Maintaining professional ethics and conduct.
- Respecting human rights and civil liberties.
- Continuous Professional Development:
- Regular Training Refresher Courses: Keeping skills sharp and personnel up-to-date with the latest threats and techniques to combat them.
- Advanced Training Opportunities: Providing opportunities for specialised training in areas like counterterrorism, hostage negotiation, or advanced driving.
The Benefits of Robust Recruitment and Training:
With a well-trained and skilled team in place, complacency is countered and risks are anticipated and minimised to provide the best possible protection for the principal and those around them. In turn, this Inspires trust and confidence in the protection services provided and helps to build a strong reputation for professionalism and expertise within the executive protection industry generally.
So What Have We Learned?
An incident like the murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson could have been prevented and yet for whatever reason, he had no protection in place when the incident occurred.
While the big tech and social media companies may have recognised the importance of, and invested in high levels of executive protection, there may well be complacency seeping into some less high-profile corporate sectors.
Particularly in industries like insurance, pharmaceuticals, healthcare and retail, threats to top executives can come at any time, from almost any direction with a myriad of different causes. Fundamentally, these companies should focus on balancing profit and performance with customer care and staff welfare. Combatting dissatisfaction in this way is the first step in reducing the levels of risk that their executives face.
Having the right people with the right traits and characteristics and high levels of training can help anticipate and mitigate the risks that top executives and those around them face.
Often, the best approach is to engage the services of a security contractor to provide training, risk evaluation and the robustly recruited and trained personnel that are essential to executive protection
Contact our team to discuss your executive protection requirements. Get expert advice and a competitive, no-obligation quote.
Please click to call or complete the contact form stating your location and requirements, and we will get back to you at the earliest opportunity.